The law changed on 1 May 2026. Section 21 is abolished and new tenancies are now assured periodic tenancies. See what every landlord must do →
Houses in Multiple Occupation

HMO Management Regulations: A Landlord’s Guide

← Part of Houses in Multiple Occupation

The Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006 impose specific legal duties on the manager of every HMO in England — including HMOs that are not licensable. The regulations cover structural maintenance, fire safety, water and drainage, gas and electricity, common parts, refuse, and information disclosure to occupiers. Breach is a criminal offence with civil penalties up to £30,000. This page sets out exactly what the regulations require, how the duties operate in practice, and how to manage compliance through documentation and routine inspection.

What the regulations are and who they apply to

The Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006 are statutory regulations made under the Housing Act 2004. They impose specific legal duties on the manager of every HMO in England, regardless of whether the HMO is licensed. They have been in force since 6 April 2007 and remain in their original form, though related legislation around them — particularly fire safety — has shifted substantially.

“Manager” in the regulations means whoever has control of the HMO. In most cases this is the landlord. Where a letting agent or property manager has been formally appointed to manage the property and exercise day-to-day control, the agent or manager may be the regulated person. The regulations are clear that the obligations cannot be contracted out of: a landlord cannot escape liability by appointing an agent who themselves fails to comply.

The regulations apply to every property that meets the HMO definition in section 254 of the Housing Act 2004. Importantly, they apply even to HMOs that are not licensable. A small HMO with three or four sharers in an area without additional licensing is still subject to the management regulations — the duties exist independently of the licensing regime.

The structural duties

The first set of duties relates to the physical fabric and infrastructure of the property. The manager must ensure that all of the following are kept in good repair and proper working order:

  • The roof, walls, foundations, and other structural elements of the building.
  • External walls, doors, and windows including their frames and fittings.
  • Drains, gutters, downpipes, and external pipework.
  • The water supply system — pipes, taps, hot water cylinder, and connections to the mains.
  • The drainage system including soil pipes, waste pipes, and connections to public sewers.
  • The gas supply system, where there is gas at the property.
  • The electrical installation throughout the property.
  • Space heating and water heating installations.

“In good repair” is more demanding than “not actively broken”. The standard expected is the condition the items would be in if the property had been properly maintained throughout its operation as an HMO. A leaking gutter that has been leaking for six months is not in good repair, even if the manager would point out it has not yet caused damage. A boiler operating reliably but without a recent service may not be in proper working order in the regulatory sense.

The duty arises on the manager when they become aware of disrepair — usually when an occupier reports it. The manager then has a reasonable time to investigate and act. What is reasonable depends on the nature of the defect: emergency matters such as no heating in winter or no hot water within 24-48 hours; significant repairs within a few days to two weeks; routine maintenance within four weeks. The manager who waits for a second complaint before acting risks an enforcement notice or civil penalty.

The fire safety duties

Regulation 4 of the 2006 Regulations imposes specific fire safety duties on the manager. These sit alongside the duties under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 — they do not replace them. The headline duties are:

Means of escape from fire must be maintained at all times. This means the escape routes from each storey must be clear of obstructions, fire doors must close properly and self-close where required, escape route lighting must work, and any fire alarms or detectors must be operational. A manager who allows clutter to accumulate in a stairwell, or who fails to replace a faulty fire door closer, is in breach.

Fire safety equipment must be in good working order. This covers smoke alarms (interlinked, mains-wired in most HMOs), heat detectors in kitchens, emergency lighting on escape routes (mandatory in larger HMOs), fire extinguishers (where provided), fire blankets, and any sprinkler systems. The manager must ensure regular testing — typically weekly for alarms with a quick test, six-monthly with a fuller maintenance check by a competent person, and annual servicing of any larger systems.

Fire safety information must be displayed for occupiers. This includes a fire action notice setting out what occupiers should do in the event of a fire — typically: leave immediately by the nearest escape route, do not stop to collect belongings, call 999 once safely outside, do not re-enter the property until told it is safe by the fire service.

A 2023 amendment to the Fire Safety Order 2005 (made by the Building Safety Act 2022) removed the previous concession allowing very small employers and managers to keep fire risk assessments in their head rather than recording them in writing. Since October 2023, every HMO must have a written fire risk assessment, with arrangements documented and reviewed regularly. There is no minimum size threshold — the requirement applies to every HMO regardless of the number of bedrooms or occupiers.

We deal with HMO fire safety in detail on a separate page — see our HMO fire safety guide.

The amenity duties

Regulation 5 covers water supply and drainage. The manager must ensure that the water supply is not interrupted unreasonably and that the drainage is not blocked. In practice this means responding quickly to any reported water supply or drainage issue, maintaining stop valves and isolation cocks in working order, and ensuring tenants know where the stop valve is.

Regulation 6 covers gas and electricity. There must be no unreasonable interruption to either supply. This duty interacts with the manager’s wider obligations on annual gas safety inspections and EICR currency.

Regulation 7 imposes a duty on the manager regarding common parts. The common parts of the HMO — entrance halls, stairwells, corridors, shared kitchens, shared bathrooms, gardens — must be:

  • Kept clean and in a reasonable state of repair.
  • Maintained free from obstruction.
  • Adequately lit.
  • Where window glass forms part of a common-parts wall, kept clear of obstruction so far as light penetration is concerned.
  • Where there are external structures such as porches and outbuildings forming part of the common parts, kept in repair and good order.

Regulation 8 covers refuse storage and disposal. The manager must provide adequate refuse storage, ensure refuse is not allowed to accumulate, and arrange disposal in line with local authority collections. Many enforcement actions begin with refuse complaints — a long-running pile of bin bags in the front garden of an HMO is an obvious indicator of management failure to a passing officer.

The information disclosure duty

Regulation 3 imposes a specific information duty. The manager must:

  • Provide their name, address, and telephone number to each occupier.
  • Display the same information prominently in the property, in a position visible to all occupiers.
  • Ensure occupiers know how to contact the manager in case of a problem with the property.

A common compliance failure: the manager’s contact details are mentioned in the tenancy agreement at the start of the tenancy, but not displayed anywhere in the property and not refreshed if the manager changes. Both the displayed and the personally-served information are required.

The information disclosure duty interacts with — but is separate from — the Renters’ Rights Act 2025’s requirement to provide a written statement of terms. The 2006 regulation predates the RRA and is not satisfied by the written statement. Display the contact information in the property as well.

The occupier-conduct provisions

Regulation 9 sets out duties on the occupiers. These are not duties the landlord can enforce by self-help, but they are relevant where a manager faces criticism for conditions caused by occupier behaviour rather than landlord neglect. Occupiers must:

  • Conduct themselves so as not to hinder the manager in performing their duties.
  • Take reasonable care of the property and the equipment in it.
  • Not damage anything that the manager is required to maintain.
  • Dispose of refuse appropriately.
  • Comply with any reasonable arrangements the manager makes for fire safety.

Where an occupier breaches Regulation 9, the manager has a defence to enforcement action where the breach was caused by the occupier’s misconduct. Document occupier breaches contemporaneously — date, photo, witness — because retrospective evidence is much weaker.

Penalties for breach

Breach of any provision of the 2006 Regulations is a criminal offence under section 234 of the Housing Act 2004. The penalty regime mirrors HMO licensing breaches: criminal prosecution with an unlimited fine, or a civil penalty of up to £30,000 per offence imposed by the local authority.

The civil penalty has been the default enforcement tool since 2017, primarily because it does not require the local authority to satisfy the criminal standard of proof. The council needs only to be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the breach occurred. Appeal lies to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) within 28 days, but the burden is on the landlord to show that the penalty should be reduced or set aside.

Multiple breaches across a property compound rapidly. A poorly-managed HMO might attract penalties for fire safety failures (£10,000), refuse storage failures (£5,000), failure to display contact details (£2,000), and disrepair (£8,000) — totalling £25,000 in a single enforcement round. The civil penalty regime is more punitive than landlords often appreciate.

Civil penalties also feed into the rogue landlord database and into future fit-and-proper-person assessments. A landlord with two or more civil penalties for housing offences in the previous five years is in serious difficulty when applying for new HMO licences.

What good practice looks like

A landlord who actively manages compliance with the 2006 Regulations follows a few principles consistently.

Document everything. Maintenance records, gas safety records, EICR, fire risk assessment, displayed contact information photographs, refuse collection arrangements, and a log of any tenant complaints with the action taken. The records are the manager’s primary defence in any enforcement action.

Inspect periodically. A management visit every six months, with a written inspection record, identifies issues before they become enforcement matters. Many councils’ licensing conditions require landlords to inspect — making it a contractual obligation as well as a practical good idea.

Respond quickly. The duty arises on knowledge of disrepair. The manager who responds within 24 hours to an emergency, within a week to a significant defect, and within a month to routine maintenance demonstrates management of the property in good faith — even if the actual repair takes longer.

Train any agents. Where a letting agent or property manager has been appointed, the landlord’s duties are not displaced. The landlord remains responsible for ensuring the agent complies. Brief the agent about the regulations and include compliance reporting in the management contract.

Treat the regulations as a baseline, not a ceiling. The 2006 Regulations set the minimum. A well-run HMO substantially exceeds these requirements — better maintenance, better-informed tenants, better-quality fire safety, and faster response times. The cost of operating well is small compared to the cost of operating just well enough to avoid enforcement.

Authoritative sources